1. Chow, C. W. 1983. The Effects of Job Standard Tightness and Compensation Scheme on Performance: an Exploration of Linkages. The Accounting Review 58(4):667‐685.
2. Young, S. M. 1985. Participative Budgeting: the Effects of Risk Aversion and Asymmetric Information on Budgetary Slack. Journal of Accounting Research 23(2):829‐842.
3. Weick, K. E. 1989. Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination. The Academy of Management Review 14(4):516‐531.
4. Birnberg, J. G., M. D. Shields, and S. M. Young. 1990. The Case for Multiple Methods in Empirical Management Accounting Research, with an Illustration from Budget Setting. Journal ofManagement Accounting Research 2(1):33‐66.
5. Young, S. M., J. Fisher, and T. M. Lindquist. 1993. The Effects of Intergroup Competition and Intragroup Cooperation on Slack and Output in a Manufacturing Setting. The Accounting Review 68(3):466‐481.
6.Nohria, N., and R. Gulati. 1996. Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation. The Academy of Management Journal 39(5):1245‐1264.
7. Langfield‐Smith, K.. 1997. Management Control Systems and Strategy: a eing,ni. Critical Rview. Account Orgazations and Society 22(2):207‐232 . Ittner, C. D., and D. F. Larcker. 1998. Are Nonfinancial Measures Leading
8 Indicatof Financial Performance. Journal of Accounting Research 36:1‐35.
9. Van der Stede, W. A.. 2000. The Relationship between Two Consequences of Budgetary Controls: Budgetary Slack Creation and Managerial Short‐term Orientation. Accounting, Organization and Society 25(6): 609‐622.
10. Banker, R. D., G. Potter, and D. Srinivasan. 2000. An Empirical Investigation of an Incentive Plan That Includes Nonfinancial Performance Measures. The Accounting Review 75(1):65‐92.
11. Lipe, M. G., and S. E. Salterio. 2000. The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Common and Unique Performance Measures. The Accounting Review 75(3):283‐298.
